|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Sir Paul McCartney said it best:
Quote:When you were young and your heart was an open skillbook You used to say Titans For The Win (You know you did, you know you, you know did) But in this ever changing game we live in, Makes you log in your Titan and cry
Time To Unsub and Don't Fly (Unsub and Don't Fly) Unsub and Don't Fly (Unsub and Don't Fly)
What does it matter to ya When you got sub caps that will do You gotta fly'em well Fighting fair is hell
Time To Unsub and Don't Fly (Unsub and Don't Fly) Unsub and Don't Fly (Unsub and Don't Fly)
You used to say Titans For The Win (You know you did, you know you, you know did) But in this ever changing game we live, Makes you log in your Titan and cry
You have only yourselves to blame. Squeaky wheels get the grease, and you did a lot of squeaking by showing a Titan could kill a destroyer without support. Howitzers are not meant for killing butterflies and had you not done it so often CCP would not be forced to ask the question "Just how broken are Titans?" Really isn't dropping 24 titans to clear a field full of sup cabs just intellectually lazy? I thought elite PVP meant you understood how to vary up fleet roles to counter a multiple threat encounter? Lets be honest elite PVP means RMTing for an endgame toy that was never meant to be an automatic trump card to any fleet engagement. It could have been, but again you were way to obvious with it and CCP had to fix such a broken game mechanic. Thanks for your beta Titan testing efforts! |
Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance.
So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. |
Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Quest Liem wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree?
I absolutely disagree if a fleet of 50 decided to take on a fleet of 300 either roaming around or headed to a fleet fight, that's just poor fcing. If its a corp of 50 that found itself in a war with a corp of 300, that's poor diplomacy and planning. Now if a fleet of 50 can perform hit and run tactics on the field and that 300 loses heart, hides in station or doesn't log, that is just delicious tears. Now if a group of 50 has essentially half its players in Titans able to do the job of 20 ships per titan then that group of 300 is in the unfair position by your standard.
If you are so worried for smaller groups looking to get a chance in null sec why don't you ask CCP to double the size of null sec? It promises to break some power blocs and at the very least these power blocs can't hold all that space. Hey do you think that if there was more space people in Hi Sec think they might have a chance out in Null and that might make the game exciting and attractive to new players. Really what do you think is better a broken kill anything ship that makes a few RMTing Emo space nerds happy or more null sec systems to allow new blood to come in and help drive game content? |
Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
mkd0815 wrote:i can only say this is a bad fix.
i have no clue how a fix that wrong happened to get online . where is your QA department ?
Okay why was it a bad fix? Let's hear some good analytic reasons. |
Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
Quote:Because the honorable mittani and the goons are a role model for moral integrity and aloofness. Please, get over yourself. Look at the whole picture from a non biased standpoint and even you will have to acknowledge that this "fix" is ****, halfassed. It doesn't matter where anyone touched your subcapitals. The very concept of this adjustment is wrong. They should do it right the first time, not rush some crap out and alienate one part of the playerbase.
Try to be objective for once.
Okay let's be objective:
The utilitarian argument: Fewer players actually use Titans, more players fly sub caps so lets make sure they enjoy the game.
The pragmatic argument: Titan's are supposed to be powerful and a threat to a number of ships, just not all ships.
The rational argument: Cannons aren't used for swatting flies.
The selfish argument: The few should be able to have a powerful ship that can be a threat to all ships and despite being a cannon it should be able to pluck the wings off a fly and by fly I mean Rifter.
So class 3 of these arguments are based on logic and not emotion. 1 of these arguments sums up what a coward hiding behind an alt is essentially saying. Which argument do you think that coward is using? |
Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:07:00 -
[6] - Quote
Daiony wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quote:Because the honorable mittani and the goons are a role model for moral integrity and aloofness. Please, get over yourself. Look at the whole picture from a non biased standpoint and even you will have to acknowledge that this "fix" is ****, halfassed. It doesn't matter where anyone touched your subcapitals. The very concept of this adjustment is wrong. They should do it right the first time, not rush some crap out and alienate one part of the playerbase.
Try to be objective for once. Okay let's be objective: The utilitarian argument: Fewer players actually use Titans, more players fly sub caps so lets make sure they enjoy the game. The pragmatic argument: Titan's are supposed to be powerful and a threat to a number of ships, just not all ships. The rational argument: Cannons aren't used for swatting flies. The selfish argument: The few should be able to have a powerful ship that can be a threat to all ships and despite being a cannon it should be able to pluck the wings off a fly and by fly I mean Rifter. So class 3 of these arguments are based on logic and not emotion. 1 of these arguments sums up what a coward hiding behind an alt is essentially saying. Which argument do you think that coward is using? I am not opposed to a titan nerf. I am opposed to this "fix" because of its diletantic and amateuristic execution. I can differentiate.
I have a better idea why don't you explain exactly why its diletantic and amateuristic instead of being shallow and pedantic with your rebuttals. |
Scooter McCabe
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
John Maynard Keynes wrote:hioshi IV wrote:@CCP: Your drawing your own death.
Look at this topic, more and more people are starting to see your connection/favoritism towards goons.
Soon, your corruption will be exposed, you will die, and i wont feel sorry for you.
.. This is still just a game! Nobody will die...
*Beep* *Beep* I'm A Nerf. |
|
|
|